<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Betraying the Reformation: The Sad Legacy of The Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cyberbrethren.com/2009/09/08/the-joint-declaration-on-the-doctrine-of-justification-was-and-is-a-fraud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cyberbrethren.com/2009/09/08/the-joint-declaration-on-the-doctrine-of-justification-was-and-is-a-fraud/</link>
	<description>by Rev. Paul T. McCain</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 01:34:56 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: D. Philip Veitch</title>
		<link>http://cyberbrethren.com/2009/09/08/the-joint-declaration-on-the-doctrine-of-justification-was-and-is-a-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-8386</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Philip Veitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberbrethren.com/?p=3044#comment-8386</guid>
		<description>As a Confessional, Reformed and Calvinistic Anglican (there are a few around), I find your valiance for the Book of Concord refreshing and encouraging.  I&#039;m too well read to be narrow and provincial (e.g.like many Reformed Professors) and am too well read not to know where I&#039;ve settled...and justification by faith alone is one such spot, among others.  Sing it, pray it, preach it, liturgize it, catechetize...never forget it said Luther somewhere.  Our hearts want justification by works.  Scriptures has discerned and taught us otherwise.  Many thanks.  Refreshing. Philip</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Confessional, Reformed and Calvinistic Anglican (there are a few around), I find your valiance for the Book of Concord refreshing and encouraging.  I&#8217;m too well read to be narrow and provincial (e.g.like many Reformed Professors) and am too well read not to know where I&#8217;ve settled&#8230;and justification by faith alone is one such spot, among others.  Sing it, pray it, preach it, liturgize it, catechetize&#8230;never forget it said Luther somewhere.  Our hearts want justification by works.  Scriptures has discerned and taught us otherwise.  Many thanks.  Refreshing. Philip</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt P.</title>
		<link>http://cyberbrethren.com/2009/09/08/the-joint-declaration-on-the-doctrine-of-justification-was-and-is-a-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-8377</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 05:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberbrethren.com/?p=3044#comment-8377</guid>
		<description>When I visited Augsburg, Germany a few years ago, our tour guide told us numerous times that the Lutherans and Roman Catholics had reconciled in 1999 and rectified what had happened in 1530.  I finally told her that this was not exactly true and that many Lutherans still held to what was confessed before Charles V in her fair city.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I visited Augsburg, Germany a few years ago, our tour guide told us numerous times that the Lutherans and Roman Catholics had reconciled in 1999 and rectified what had happened in 1530.  I finally told her that this was not exactly true and that many Lutherans still held to what was confessed before Charles V in her fair city.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Kyle</title>
		<link>http://cyberbrethren.com/2009/09/08/the-joint-declaration-on-the-doctrine-of-justification-was-and-is-a-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-8372</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 19:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberbrethren.com/?p=3044#comment-8372</guid>
		<description>When the JDDJ first came out, a good friend who had recently swam the Tiber, was singing its praise and talking about a new era of church unity.
I read the document and pointed out that in typical postmodern fashion it is self contradictory in several places. When he protested I told him &quot;If this were a business contract would your lawyers let you sign it with language like that in it?&quot; (He owned a very successful business at the time.) He snatched up the papers and walked away angry. We never discussed it again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the JDDJ first came out, a good friend who had recently swam the Tiber, was singing its praise and talking about a new era of church unity.<br />
I read the document and pointed out that in typical postmodern fashion it is self contradictory in several places. When he protested I told him &#8220;If this were a business contract would your lawyers let you sign it with language like that in it?&#8221; (He owned a very successful business at the time.) He snatched up the papers and walked away angry. We never discussed it again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://cyberbrethren.com/2009/09/08/the-joint-declaration-on-the-doctrine-of-justification-was-and-is-a-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-8371</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 18:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberbrethren.com/?p=3044#comment-8371</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much for this very necessary reminder, Pastor McCain.  I pretty much believed that consensus had been achieved while I was a member of an ELCA congregation.

Those Lutherans who are still convinced that the JDDJ means the same things to Catholics and Lutherans are seeing what they want to see, not what is actually there.

Christine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much for this very necessary reminder, Pastor McCain.  I pretty much believed that consensus had been achieved while I was a member of an ELCA congregation.</p>
<p>Those Lutherans who are still convinced that the JDDJ means the same things to Catholics and Lutherans are seeing what they want to see, not what is actually there.</p>
<p>Christine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ErnestO Stolpe</title>
		<link>http://cyberbrethren.com/2009/09/08/the-joint-declaration-on-the-doctrine-of-justification-was-and-is-a-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-8365</link>
		<dc:creator>ErnestO Stolpe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 14:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberbrethren.com/?p=3044#comment-8365</guid>
		<description>&quot;In my hand no price I bring - Simply to Christ I cling&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In my hand no price I bring &#8211; Simply to Christ I cling&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Maher (Past Elder)</title>
		<link>http://cyberbrethren.com/2009/09/08/the-joint-declaration-on-the-doctrine-of-justification-was-and-is-a-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-8364</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Maher (Past Elder)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 13:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberbrethren.com/?p=3044#comment-8364</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s interesting that, having been on both sides of the aisle so to speak, the analogue to confessional Lutherans over there, shall we say &quot;confessional&quot; Catholics, also find the JDDJ a sacrifice of truth on the altar of unity, some describing it as putting the RCC close to if not under its own anathemas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s interesting that, having been on both sides of the aisle so to speak, the analogue to confessional Lutherans over there, shall we say &#8220;confessional&#8221; Catholics, also find the JDDJ a sacrifice of truth on the altar of unity, some describing it as putting the RCC close to if not under its own anathemas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
