Home > Current Affairs > Martin Luther King Day

Martin Luther King Day

January 17th, 2011
Marketing Advertising Blog — VuManhThang.Com

It is time once again for me to make my annual comments about Martin Luther King day. Sadly, every year when I do this I get the same sort of responses, no matter how hard I try to be clear on why this day is so important to so many of our African-American brothers and sisters, and in fact, why it is so important for our whole country.

Sure enough there are those quite happy to entirely ignore the point of my post and wax on about how Martin Luther King was this, that, or another thing, about how his theology was bad, or how he was ‘liberal’ and on and on.

I will again however say that such comments display an astounding lack of sensitivity and concern about the feelings of our fellow Americans who look to Martin Luther King as a significant figure in advancing civil rights in this nation. And please do not, please, do not say, "Some of my best friends are Black." Oh, really? Then try to be a bit more sensitive, please. Some of my best friends are left handed, but I don’t go out of my way to offend left-handed people by denigrating honoring a left-handed person whom they have high regard for. But, seriously, some of my best friends are left-handed. I even married a left-handed person. See how hollow that sounds?

I do wonder how many of us with pale skin have ever shared a table with a Black person, actually spoken at length with them as people, not as "Blacks." Similarly, how many Blacks have had Whites into their homes and hosted them for a meal and spoke to them as people, not White? I know the problem cuts both directions, but on MLK day, this is not the appropriate time for White folk to go on and one about their gripes with Black folks.

And then, I hear from people telling me how terrible the civil rights movement has been for African-Americans, and how it has only led to what is now a permanent underclass in this country, etc. etc. There is plenty to talk about here. But that the Civil Rights movement was a good thing in many ways is undeniable.

Would you have preferred the continuation of Jim Crow laws, lynchings and telling people they can’t drink from certain water fountains, use certain bathrooms or ride only in the back of the bus or not be served a meal just because their skin is dark? Would you feel the same if the laws were in reverse and it was the white-skinned who could not do these things? "Good Christians" are not immune are they? I still have a vivid memory of angst being expressed by some members of my home congregation when Black folks showed up once for Holy Communion, from the common cup! And that was only in the late 1960s, not that too far long ago.

After the Civil War and well into the 1960s many, many African-Americans were still treated nearly like slaves in so many place. Despite the Civil War, many states made it impossible for blacks to vote and via indentured servanthood [aka sharecropping] created a serfdom across the South? Can we be a bit sensitive to the bitter, hard and long struggle of a people brought to this country as slaves?" [Yes, yes, I know blacks sold other blacks into slavery in Africa...and yes, African-Americans can be as prejudiced against others because of race as anyone else].

So, I apologize for what appears to be a gloomy post, but it is always sad that whenever anyone tries to say anything about Civil Rights, particularly on MLK day, we have to have a litany from white folks criticizing, whining and complaining, thus quite entirely missing the point of MLK and his meaning for our nation and for so many of our fellow citizens.

I’m actually seeing signs that the times they are a changing. When I was a kid it was inevitable that we would refer to other kids as "that black kid" and no doubt they would refer to us "as that white kid." My own kids have delighted me in that they have spoken of friends by name and never once have referred to them as "that black kid" or "you know, my Chinese friend." They’ve had friends over to the house that we have heard about from school for weeks and I’ve been delighted to find they are African or Chinese, and not once did our kids refer to them by race, but by their qualities as persons. A good sign indeed and this is where we need to be. No, it is unrealistic to believe we will ever be "color blind." That’s not what I’m suggesting, but it would be great if we would not always jump to race as the first way to describe a person.

Recently in an interview on 60 minutes one of my favorite actors, Morgan Freeman, laid it out in a blunt way. He just wants to be referred to as a person, not a black man, but as a man. And he thought the notion of a "black history" month to be absurd, and even insulting, trying to suggest his "history" could be reduced to a month on the calendar.

I believe it is a necessary and good thing in the kingdom of the left, to work for that day when across this great nation people will be judged by the content of their character, not the color of their skin. And I suspect that if people’s skin tone was a bit more dark than it may be now they might have some better sense of why this is a dream worthy of our full support, and sympathy. So, I say, "Happy MLK day."

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
Categories: Current Affairs
  1. Bruce Gee
    January 15th, 2006 at 20:17 | #1

    Thank you for these comments. I understand how hard it is to make a clear, concise, honest, complete statement about race in this country. As you point out, this cuts both ways, and the most vocal of black apologists use their podium to make political hay, whilst many whites use this example as an excuse to not work toward better friendships between people of the two races. Thanks for reminding me that tomorrow is an important day for many a person, and that I would be mindful not to degrade it.

  2. Rich
    January 16th, 2006 at 15:09 | #2

    Thanks for taking the more difficult, but more God-pleasing stance regarding race.

  3. organshoes
    January 17th, 2006 at 10:35 | #3

    I live in the Deep South, and I’ve pointed out to my young adult son, when we’re in some restaurant, that in my lifetime blacks were refused service in a place like this. Indeed, we witness black people my age or older, being served by white waiters, no less, who would’ve once been refused. Legally.
    I’m from the North, and as a teenager prior to civil rights legislation, I’d be stunned on trips south to see segregated water fountains and rest rooms–big, machine-printed signs: “Whites Only,” “Coloreds Only.” Now, we’re at least in the same room, expecting the same quality meal and service.
    I think more white Americans need to be reminded of that–that we couldn’t do the most basic human things in the same place. It was legal to make a little black girl go to a separate facility, or to refuse her a meal–a seat at the table, even.
    We need to be taught that’s the way it was, and not so long ago. And MLK helped to end that, and so much more.

  4. January 21st, 2006 at 13:40 | #4

    Well said indeed.

  5. January 17th, 2011 at 15:14 | #5

    Thanks so much for your words which were both well-thought-out and well-expressed.

  6. January 17th, 2011 at 16:00 | #6

    Maybe my youth and post-racial outlook are causing me to miss the point, but your post kind of offended me. I sense that your heart is in the right place and I agree with the very end of what you said. But from the start you came across like you are saying that we can’t critique Dr. King’s ideas and people who bring up his historically verifiable theological and political views are insensitive racists. You eluded to some obvious troglodytes who made offensive comments in the past and I suspect that this has heavily influenced your rhetoric. I hope that’s what is going on here.

    I’m with Morgan Freeman on this one. Martin Luther King was not a BLACK leader. He was a leader. As such, he should be studied and evaluated like all other leaders: as an actual human being with real merits and flaws who had real opinions and beliefs rather than some sanatized symbol who is only superficially known so as not to offend anyone.

    I’m sure your reply will clear this all up. Thanks!

    Happy MLK day!

    “History will have to record that the greatest tragedy of this period of social transition was not the strident clamor of the bad people, but the appalling silence of the good people.”
    -Dr. King

  7. Ben Baldus
    January 17th, 2011 at 19:28 | #7

    I appreciate your comments. The commemoration of Martin Luther King’s advocacy and preaching for a more just and inclusive society seems to be a pan-Lutheran controversy. Thanks!

  8. Lance Armstrong O’Donnell
    January 17th, 2011 at 21:21 | #8

    Amen, Paul.

  9. January 18th, 2011 at 01:45 | #9

    It seems to me that our Lutheran distinction between ‘civil righteousness’ and ‘righteousness before God’ can help Americans to sincerely appreciate and give thanks for the achievements of Dr King in advancing the civil rights of African Americans even while maintaining reservations about his theology and beliefs. This distinction can be read up on in the standard Lutheran dogmatics texts. I think it is a way of looking at things that serves us well in these complicated times.

Comments are closed.