Home > Art, Commemorations/Sanctoral Cycle of the Church Year > Commemoration of Lucas Cranach and Albrecht Dürer: Christian Artists

Commemoration of Lucas Cranach and Albrecht Dürer: Christian Artists

April 6th, 2012
Marketing Advertising Blog — VuManhThang.Com

CranachWeimarAltar

Note: For a very large version of this painting, click on the image.

 

Today we commemorate Lucas Cranach and Albrecht Dürer, artists. Here are portraits of them, the Dürer portait is a self-portrait, as is, perhaps, the Cranach portrait.

 

Lucas Cranach, at age 77

 

 

Albrecht Dürer, age 29

In honor of this day and their memory, here is a presentation, and explanation of, what I regard to be the finest example of the uniquely Lutheran art that resulted from the great Gospel rediscovery in the Sixteenth Century, and appropriately, what a magnificent painting to meditate on and ponder as we move toward Holy Week. Enjoy, and God bless!

Lucas Cranach the Younger finished the painting in 1555, and even after 450 years, there is a powerful luminous warmth to it that draws you in, causing you to ponder and meditate on the image it presents. The painting still stands where it was originally placed, over the altar of the St. Peter and Paul Church in Weimar, Germany. The placement of this painting over the altar is purposeful, for the Lutheran Reformation, far from casting aside the Lord’s Supper as central to the worship of the Church, restored it to its proper place as the gift from Christ that it is. Communicants coming forward to receive the Supper, would have this painting before them, so large there was no chance of missing its every detail, details which proclaim and declare the peace, comfort, joy and power of the good news of Jesus Christ, and the love of God in Christ for all humanity.

To this day, the painting that stands over the altar at the St. Peter and Paul Church in Weimar, Germany, glows with a radiance that takes the viewer’s breath away. It is the most remarkable example of the uniquely Lutheran use of altar paintings to confess the Gospel rediscovery in the Sixteenth Century Reformation. Here is a good explanation of it and its meaning.

“A picture is worth a thousand words.” This is certainly true of the centre panel of the altar painting in the church of Sts Peters and Paul, Weimar, Germany. It was begun by Lucas Cranach (1472-1553) and was completed by his son, also of the same name, in 1555. (To distinguish them, they are called Lucas Cranach the Elder and Lucas Cranach the Younger.)

The heart of the 16th century Reformation and indeed of the Christian faith, is the doctrine of justification by faith alone in Christ. This is how Luther expresses it in part 2 of the Smalcald Articles.

“The first and chief article is this, that Jesus Christ, our God and Lord, “was put to death for our trespasses and raised again for our justification” (Rom 4:25). He alone is “the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world” (John 1:29). “God has laid upon him the iniquities of us all” (Isa.53:6). Moreover, “all have sinned,” and “they are justified by his grace as a gift, through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus, by his blood” (Rom. 3:23-25).

Inasmuch as this must be believed and cannot be obtained or apprehended by any work, law, or merit, it is clear and certain that such faith alone justifies us, as St Paul says in Romans 3, “For we hold that a man is justified by faith apart from works of law” (Rom. 3:28), and again, “that he [God] himself is righteous and that he justifies him who has faith in Jesus” (Rom. 3:26).

If the doctrine of justification is to be properly taught, law and gospel must be properly distinguished. The Formula of Concord of 1577 says (Article 5),

“We must … observe this distinction with particular diligence lest we confuse the two doctrines and change the Gospel into law. This would darken the merit of Christ and rob disturbed consciences of the comfort which they would otherwise have in the holy Gospel …”

That Lucas Cranach clearly understood the central teaching of the Lutheran reformation and the proper distinction between Law and Gospel is illustrated by his altar painting at Weimar.

In the centre background, Moses is shown teaching the ten commandments to the Old Testament prophets. They are standing on a circle of barren path, along with a figure representative of all human beings who are under the law’s condemnation. Man is shown here being chased into the fires of hell by death (pictured as a skeleton holding a spear) and the devil (in the form of a monster wielding a club). The prophets taught, as did Moses, “Cursed be anyone who does not confirm the words of this law by doing them” (Deut. 27:26 ESV, compare Jer. 11:13). Yet it’s not only our actual sins that condemn us, but also the prior sin that we inherit from our parents (original sin). To quote the Smalcald Articles once again,

“Here we must confess what St Paul says in Rom. 5:12, namely, that sin had its origin in one man, Adam, through whose disobedience all men were made sinners and became subject to death and the devil. … The fruits of this sin are all the subsequent evil deeds which are forbidden in the Ten Commandments …”

The good news is that God in mercy and compassion saves all who put their trust in His Son. When the people of Israel in the wilderness sinned and were bitten by snakes, God provided a way of escape that prefigured His Son’s death on a cross. All the Israelites had to do to be saved was look at the snake mounted on a pole (Num. 21:4-9). In Cranach’s painting, this is shown in the background on the painting’s left.

Directly in front, Martin Luther is standing with open Bible in hand. His feet and hands are positioned like those of Moses. His message, however, is one of gospel, not law. On his face is a look of steadfastness and serene confidence. He stands on lush grass in which flowers grow, unlike the bare, stony ground on which Moses stands. Of three passages written in German on the open Bible, the third one reads, “Just as Moses lifted up the serpent in the desert, so also must the Son of man be lifted up, so that all [who believe] in [him may have eternal life]” (Jn 3:14).

Dominating the painting is Christ on a cross. The amazing message of the Gospel is that by his death, Christ takes away the world’s sin. The message written in Latin on the transparent banner held by the lamb in the centre foreground declares that Jesus is “the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world” (Jn 1:29). His outstretched arms and generous loincloth are also reminders that He is the world’s Saviour. This was John the Baptist’s message, and John is shown standing underneath the crucified Christ on His left side. With right hand pointing up at Christ on the cross and left hand pointing at the lamb, John is shown proclaiming the meaning of Jesus’ death to Lucas Cranach, the painter. Cranach represents all who believe. A stream of blood from Christ’s pierced side splashes on to this head. It is as the first verse on Luther’s Bible says, “The blood of Jesus Christ purifies us from all sin” (1 Jn 1:7). Therefore like Luther, Cranach also stands confidently.

There is another verse on the open Bible, to which Luther’s finger points directly. It reads, “Therefore let us approach the seat of grace with joyousness, so that we may receive mercy within and find grace in the time when help is needed” (Heb. 4:16). Such approach is possible because Jesus is our victorious high priest. Having paid for sin, He has defeated death and the devil and now lives to intercede for us. Jesus is shown on the painting’s right as the risen One, youthful and full of life, standing on death and the devil, with the staff of his victory flag pushed in the monster’s throat. His gold-edged cloak flows toward the lamb’s banner and the cross. As a result it’s actually both banner and cloak that bear the words, “the lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world”.

Believe in God; believe also in me,” the Lord says (Jn 14:1). From this painting His eyes meet ours, inviting us to believe in Him. The other set of eyes that meet ours belong to Cranach, the painter. His feet face in the direction of Christ. But he has turned from his adoration of Christ to look at us also, inviting us to believe and be saved along with him.

Article 4 of the Augsburg Confession expresses the heart of Lutheran teaching this way:

“[W]e receive forgiveness of sin and become righteous before God by grace, for Christ’s sake, through faith, when we believe that Christ suffered for us and that for his sake our sin is forgiven and righteousness and eternal life are given to us.”

For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord” (Rom. 6:23). This, in summary, is the message of the Lutheran reformation and of its foremost artists, Lucas Cranach the Elder and the Younger.

–Pastor David Buck, edited by PTM

cranachsidebar

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
  1. BGK
    April 6th, 2009 at 11:48 | #1

    Thanks Paul.

  2. Jean A. McCain
    April 6th, 2009 at 14:20 | #3

    Powerful explanation – powerful message of the cost of Christ's victory and ours. Amazing how much is included in this painting. Thank you for this thorough explanation – particularly meaningful during this Holy Week. I understand why this picture marks your site for it proclaims so clearly what you believe, teach, and proclaim…and guides us to do the same.

  3. Becky
    April 7th, 2009 at 01:00 | #5

    I've been delighted to see paintings by Cranach, Durer and others turning up here and in synodical publications and in "Good News." What a splendid restoration to their proper use! But how do you get permission to use them? I would like to use some of the old woodcuts for our church bulletin. The beautiful Durer "Trinity" is held by, I think, the Boston Museum of Art which demands a hefty fee for use. Do you get some kind of "package permission"? Or is there plenty available that is public domain?
    While I rejoice to see the tremendous art, I am also bothered by things like the handsome fund raiser brochure sent out by the seminary in Fort Wayne. I must suppose that that piece of mail cost a fortune; and I keep getting more and more such requests for funds. What's happening? Have printing and reproduction costs changed radically in the past decade? Do these elegant flyers increase donations far beyond more modest letters?

    • April 7th, 2009 at 03:09 | #6

      Becky, most every image I'm aware I've seen used in various publications is in the public domain, so there are no huge expense involved. And, yes, absolutely, a well prepared fund raising brochure produces much better results. It's all about communication. I hope you support Concordia Theological Seminary, Fort Wayne, very generously. If folks would, they would not have to ask for funding as much as they do. It's really that simple. So, respectfully, rather than be negative about these things, would you join me in praying for, and then supporting our seminaries? Thanks, and God bless.

    • Pr. John Rutz
      April 8th, 2009 at 04:04 | #7

      A couple of sources for woodcuts which are free for use in church bulletins or parish education are the Digital Image Archive at the Pitts Theological Library. All you have to do is include this acknowledgement: "Courtesy of the Digital Image Archive, Pitts Theology Library, Candler School of Theology, Emory University." A nice selection of Durer images are available at the Wetmore Print Collection of Connecticut College. To quote them: "Copyfright? We encourage your free reproduction and distribution of these digital images. You need not ask us for permission. Permission granted!"

      There are lots of woodcuts and engravings on both of these sites. Images are available in high resolution. A laser printer and standard photocopier are all you need to provide excellent quality for worship folders or brochures.

  4. Dr Matthew Phillips
    April 7th, 2009 at 19:02 | #8

    The Cranachs and Duerer were some of the greatest artists in history. I am very glad they were Lutheran. I wish we could get some artists to use their style to decorate our churches. Most modern and post-modern art (even Christian art) lacks the power of their images.

  5. April 8th, 2009 at 22:48 | #9

    One of the main problems, I think, is that most modern art has cut ties with the Church (or any religion, for that matter) and has become ignorant of its symbolism, etc. And, for that matter, to be "religious" is to commit artistic suicide in a lot of mainstream circles. Methinks many artists that could manage great power with their work shy away for fear of not being represented at a high fallutin' gallery or end up being perceived of as that "Christian Right wing nut" which could then crush their already stormy career choice.

    Of course, on the other hand, art typically has an uphill battle to fight with perceptions as it tries to enter the Church. The last 100 years have given it a pretty scattershot image as it has rolled through different modes, moods, etc. and I think the trend then for churches is to fall back on "safe" inspirational images of boats in storms, etc. as a method of having art without having to commit to whatever "beast" is unleashed on them from the artist. Aesthetics, lack of art education and/or appreciation, etc. all pour into this as well.

    But then, in terms of economics, art and artists cost money. A lot more money than prints and generic work and this can also be a fact or in deciding whether or not a church goes for hiring artists.

    Sigh. I wish it weren't like it and perhaps it isn't everywhere but my experience has told me otherwise.

  6. Craig D
    April 6th, 2011 at 10:42 | #10

    Does anyone have any ideas on how to get Lutheran churches too appreciate (incorporate) Christian art and ecclesiastical architecture? I think it may be a lost cause for our generation. However the next generation can be catechized in Lutheran art history simply by putting only the best of Christian (classical / renaissance /catholic) art in the Sunday school curriculum instead of cartoons.

  7. April 6th, 2011 at 21:56 | #11

    The commemoration of Albrecht Dürer surprised me somewhat when I first saw it in the LSB (and Michelangelo even more so – wasn’t he in some early versions or something? Or am I totally inventing this?). I know Dürer certainly favored Luther at some points, but was he “Lutheran”? I don’t really think that should be a criteria at a time when confessional boundaries were anything but settled, but the choice still surprises me. Is it for his artwork? If Matt knows more about Dürer’s religious practice or if Pastor McCain could shed some light on the selection, I’d be interested to hear it.
    Great Cranach post by the way.

    Bethany (not Jack) Kilcrease

    • April 7th, 2011 at 06:03 | #12

      Hi Bethany, I recently did more research into Dürer’s move from Romanism to Lutheranism, and yes, I am absolutely convinced he did embrace Lutheranism. He was very active in his advocacy for Lutheranism and only his [relatively] early death prevented him from fulfilling his greatest desire: to travel to Wittenberg to meet Luther personally and paint his portrait! More’s the pity, frankly, for then we would have had the finest portrait of Luther. He did paint Melanchthon.

  8. April 7th, 2011 at 12:42 | #13

    My wife purchased a reproduction poster of this painting one year for my birthday. I have it in my study. Children especially are fascinated by it and will spend long minutes looking at it and reading the explanation below it.

  9. Lois Johnson
    April 7th, 2011 at 20:54 | #14

    For more on a Christian (Lutheran) view on art through the centuries as well as a list of current artists see “State of the Arts” by Gene Edward Veith. Amazing book!

  10. Bethany Kilcrease
    April 8th, 2011 at 09:15 | #15

    Pastor McCain,

    Interesting, thanks for the update!
    Best,

    Bethany

    • April 8th, 2011 at 09:21 | #16

      I tried to find the paper I recently gave on Cranach and Dürer, with some great quotes from Dürer about Luther and the Reformation, but, alas, of course, I can not find it. I think it might be on laptop at home.

Comments are closed.