Commemoration of the Council of Nicea
Lord God, heavenly Father, at the first ecumenical Council of Nicaea, Your Church boldly confessed that it believed in one Lord Jesus Christ as being of one substance with the Father. Grant us courage to confess this saving faith with Your Church through all the ages; through Jesus Christ, our Lord. Amen.
The Christian Church’s First Ecumenical Council was convened in Nicaea (modern Isnuk, Turkey) in the early summer of AD 325 by the Roman Emperor Constantine. The emperor presided at the opening of the council. The major intended topic was the ongoing Arian controversy.
The council ruled against the Arians, who taught that Jesus was not the eternal Son of God but was created by the Father and was called Son of God because of his righteousness. The chief opponents of the Arians were Alexander, bishop of Alexandria, and his deacon, Athanasius. The council confessed the eternal divinity of Jesus and adopted the earliest version of the Nicene Creed, which in its entirety was adopted at the Council of Constantinople in 381.
Their version of what we now call the Nicene Creed was almost identical to what is now used in the Church until the third section, where the original ends, “We believe in the Holy Spirit.” It fell to the Second Ecumenical Council (First Council of Constantinople) to add what is now used. Therefore, the confession used in the churches may properly be called the Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed. The so-called filioque (where “and the Son” was inserted after the words about the Spirit proceeding from the Father) was only later added by the Roman Catholic Church and never accepted in the East.
The Council also saw the first major collaboration between Church and state since Christianity began and signaled a rise in imperial influence in affairs of the Church. Constantine called it, presided over the initial session, and, in many respects, set its agenda. While his personal religious beliefs may have been part of his reason, most scholars agree that his main fear was that a divided Christianity would result in a divided Empire. The historical irony is that the Roman Empire fractured before any major schisms in Christendom.
Nicene Creed
I believe in one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth and of all things visible and invisible.
And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, begotten of His Father before all worlds, God of God, Light of Light, very God of very God, begotten, not made, being of one substance with the Father, by whom all things were made; who for us men and for our salvation came down from heaven and was incarnate by the Holy Spirit of the virgin Mary and was made man; and was crucified also for us under Pontius Pilate. He suffered, and was buried. And the third day He rose again according to the Scriptures and ascended into heaven and sits at the right hand of the Father. And He will come again with glory to judge both the living and the dead, whose kingdom will have no end.
And I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord and Giver of Life, who proceeds from the Father and the Son, who with the Father and the Son together is worshiped and glorified, who spoke by the prophets. And I believe in one holy Christian [catholic] and apostolic Church, I acknowledge one Baptism for the remission of sins, and I look for the resurrection of the dead and the life ✠ of the world to come. Amen.
HT: Aardvark Alley


Thank you for this, it’s so healthy to remember these great events in our heritage….
Thanks for sharing this brief commemorative recapitulation.
Historical critical “progressives” have cast out the record in favor of revisions to meet a secular agenda, making republishing of the true story extremely critical.
A link to a publication with the complete and accurate history of the early Councils would be very valuable!
Thanks for that good prayer and article, Pastor.
I’ve read that “Vatican II” (1962) changed the Nicene Creed from “I believe…” to “We believe…”, amd that many American Protestant churches (ELCA, Episcopal, Presbyterian, Methodist, Reformed) have followed suit.
Do(es) any here know the purpose and significance, if any, of this change?
Thanks!
Jonathan,
According to several sources, including Ph. Schaff and the Gk. Orthodox Archdiocese of Australia, the original Greek text of the Nicene Creed was “Pisteuomen,” “We believe.” The singular, “pisteuō,” “I believe,” is the text for liturgical usage.
IIRC, the change “back” to the plural was a fruit of an “originalist” movement that sought to go back to “original” or older forms of received texts. It was well-intentioned*, but misguided, for it was based on a belief that “original” or older forms are better than later, modified texts. Sometimes this is so, sometimes not. Notice that none suggested a return to the original form of the Third Article, which was simply “We believe in the Holy Spirit,” followed by an anathema. Perhaps the anathema was anathema to them!
It’s rather ironic that so many have jettisoned the intended liturgical form of this Creed from the liturgy.
*P.S. And which road is paved with good intentions?
@Jonathan Trost
The Creed as confessed at Nicaea began “We believe.” It was (and is) a collective confession of the Church against heresy. However, early on, when it became part of the church’s liturgy, the wording was changed to “I believe,” a collective confession made the individual’s own. When the newer liturgies were developed in the late sixties and early seventies, churches tended to revert to “We believe.”
@Rev. Michael Penikis
Thanks for that good info, Pastor. Because “Credo” vs. “Credemus” doesn’t affect the Creed’s contents, I suppose the difference is “no big deal”.
But, some things that might argue in favor of “We” rather than “I” are: 1) in both St. Matthew’s and St. Luke’s Gospels, we are taught to pray “Our Father” rather than “My Father”; and 2) in the chorale we sing, Luther uses “Wir galuben all’…” rather than “Ich glaube…”
I guess what I like about “We” is that it affirms the Church, Its faith, Its community, and Its catholicity. IMO, the use of “I” lends itself toward privitization of the faith.
What was the basis for using the liturgical form “I”? Was it that, prior to the Reformation, only the celebrant recited the Creed during mass? Just curious.
Thanks.
Don’t forget that Luther in his great creedal hymn chose WIR glauben instead of the singular I believe…
Also, Pastor Peters, your comment reminds me of the repeated assertion in the Formula of Concord: “WE believe, teach and confess….WE reject and condemn.”